Ene12
Digital camera capturing and you may identification number having gender/age groups
Comentarios desactivados en Digital camera capturing and you may identification number having gender/age groups
To allow comparisons having earlier studies, we as well as applied nonspatial get-recapture approaches to imagine adult jaguar thickness (get a hold of Appendix B to possess procedures and show).
Quoting cub thickness and inhabitants construction
We projected densities on their own for males, reproductive female, and nonreproductive women. We made an effort to fit patterns straight to observations off cubs, but their sparse take records don’t bring sufficient analysis to possess a maximum likelihood research. To guess cub density, datingmentor.org/pl/anastasiadate-recenzja/ we increased this new reproductive ladies occurrence from our better design because of the mean level of cubs for each and every reproductive female. This type of quotes acceptance calculation out of full jaguar occurrence and you may population design for men, nonreproductive female, reproductive girls, and you will cubs.
Show
The full testing work was twelve,302 camera pitfall-evening. I acquired 1465 captures, as well as 1369 with recognizable individuals (Desk step one). Overall, we known 42 jaguars, and additionally fourteen adult males, fourteen adult lady, and you may 14 cubs. Of your own 14 photographed adult ladies, seven have been positively recreating and you will photographed with cubs (Photographs D1, D2). Although we registered equal numbers of people, women, and you can cubs on the analysis town, this new grab volume of each category differed: 58% off understood pictures had been the ones from people (798 captures), 33% regarding identifiable captures was in fact the ones from females (452), and only nine% was indeed that from cubs (119). On average, people had been seized 56 minutes per, female 32 times, and cubs just 9 minutes. Reproductive ladies got somewhat higher final number out-of catches than nonreproductive people (257 in the place of 195, respectively) and better mediocre quantity of catches each individual (38 in the place of twenty-eight). Reproductive people was with greater regularity grabbed by yourself (109 times) than just followed closely by cubs (69 catches) during the period of identified kids dependency. Having said that, cubs was in fact registered with greater regularity using their mothers (83 private catches) than by yourself (36 catches).
Occurrence quotes of adult jaguars
Of the 32 models analyzed with the secr package with sex/reproductive status and sessions as covariates, those which did not allow density to vary across sessions obtained the lowest AICc values. In contrast, models assuming density variation across sessions received less support (Tables 2, C1). The top secr model for adult jaguars included an effect of sex/female reproductive status on D, ? 0, and ? and between session variation in ? 0. All three parameters differed significantly between sex/reproductive status groups (Table 3). Baseline detection probability was lowest for reproductive females (0.04 on average), whereas nonreproductive females had the greatest baseline detectability (0.13 on average) and males intermediate (0.08 on average) to the two female reproductive classes. Males had the largest values of estimated movement distribution (? = 2.97 ± 0.09 km), while reproductive and nonreproductive females obtained smaller ? values (2.04 ± 0.11 and 2.32 ± 0.19 km, respectively). Estimated densities were higher for reproductive females and males (1.97 ± 0.33 and 1.62 ± 0.22 individuals/ 100 km 2 , respectively) than for nonreproductive females (0.85 ± 0.19 individuals/100 km 2 ). In total, the best model estimated 4.44 ± 1.16 adult jaguars/100 km 2 (Table 3).
Cub thickness and jaguar population framework
Out-of observations of your own eight reproductive lady with children within the data period, we projected 1.64 cubs for every reproductive women normally. Concurrently, you to definitely cub was registered alone on a single occasion together with an as yet not known mom. I excluded which lone observance regarding then analysis. On such basis as reproductive lady density throughout the best model, we estimated step three.23 cubs/a hundred km 2 regarding the analysis urban area. Therefore, i projected a total thickness of seven.67 jaguars/a hundred km dos . Jaguar populace framework try 21% males, 11% nonreproductive lady, 26% reproductive ladies, and 42% cubs (Dining table step 3).
Recent Comments